Homosexuality encouraging sexual acts

I found on a site somebody had thought homosexuality encouraged sexual acts such as pedophileing, beastality, incest, etc.
Do u think it does? I don't personally think so but it may get ppl who are into these acts demand for marriage rights, etc. because homosexuals got theirs. But I don't think it encourages ppl to go out and find some little boy to rape. What do u guys think?

How does homosexuality increase the activity amongst pedophiles? Doesn't make any sense to me.

i dont mind if people are gay unless they go around bragging about it, every single thing they do being gay, and trying to piss people off.

Socky wrote:I found on a site somebody had thought homosexuality encouraged sexual acts such as pedophileing, beastality, incest, etc.

have fun getting marriage rights for beastiality.

1. this person is wrong.
2. this guy is assuming that incest and beastiality are wrong, which is not necessarily true

i see the idea that they have, saying that pedos think "hey, if men and women are ok, then children should be too" not saying i agree with it

No. But having a van does.

That's a pile of **** marriage is for two equals who have a certain level of intelligence and understanding of the procedures and are willing to do so same with sex apart from the inteligence part children do not understand marriage or sex so should not take part In eather activity animals have no way of communicateing concent or disent and incesteres shouldn't have kids adoption is an option( if they are mentally stable)

Ninja frog wrote:That's a pile of **** marriage is for two equals who have a certain level of intelligence and understanding of the procedures and are willing to do so same with sex apart from the inteligence part children do not understand marriage or sex so should not take part In eather activity animals have no way of communicateing concent or disent and incesteres shouldn't have kids adoption is an option( if they are mentally stable)

Jeeze, talk about no periods.
And anyways I'm sorta confused about wat ur sayin :/ its too jumbled up for me, can u explain wat ur sayin please

Ninja frog wrote:That's a pile of **** marriage is for two equals who have a certain level of intelligence and understanding of the procedures and are willing to do so same with sex apart from the inteligence part children do not understand marriage or sex so should not take part In eather activity animals have no way of communicateing concent or disent and incesteres shouldn't have kids adoption is an option( if they are mentally stable)

hes saying that when it comes to incest, adopt, beastiality is up for debate because animals dont speak english, and that children lack enough understanding to make informed decisions about sex and marriage

oh yeah, that makes sense, thanks achy!

beastiality is wrong because the animals have no way of giveing consent

Ninja frog wrote:beastiality is wrong because the animals have no way of giveing consent

Yeah Agreed, I don't think its right.

Ninja frog wrote:beastiality is wrong because the animals have no way of giveing consent

Unless you're a NINJA animal, like yourself, then there's consent.

Frogs can talk to frogs

Why on Earth do gays wanna be married and miserable like the rest of us? enjoy the excuse not to marry I say!
as for the site that sounds like it's unsound science, what is he basing it out of, how big is the variable group, is there a control, and finally is there a history of sexual misconduct or fetish in the testing group.

Ninja frog wrote:beastiality is wrong because the animals have no way of giveing consent

In space, no one can hear you say no...

Called radio communications achy also a punch to the ***** is a surefire way of saying no